meetings:2025-10-05

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
meetings:2025-10-05 [2025/10/06 02:19] – [Agenda Item 2] jessimunnmeetings:2025-10-05 [2025/10/06 02:33] (current) – [New business] jessimunn
Line 212: Line 212:
  
 ====== New business ====== ====== New business ======
 +\\
 +Ruth: I don't know if you read something that Fay sent out, I'd encourage you to read it and would encourage discussion at a not-meeting time.
  
 +Owen: this is going to come up on the meeting on Thursday. In essence, she's going to ask for a Mutual Termination Agreement. There's a whole lot of discussion around this and I'd like to say I feel like myself and other officers in the house, Fay's withdraw type of communication has created a lot of frustration and uncertainty around the room swaps or staying/going situation. contribution on a maintenance level has some confusion. I don't feel on all of those levels that Fay has acted in good faith and it has caused extra work for getting things done in a productive way. when everyone looks at this, is to not take the request for Mutual Termination as anything higher than a house-level discussion. and I'm all for having individual concessions based on individual circumstances. i've done a lot of thought and timeline work on this--i don't think her withdraw from of communication on this is in good faith.
 +
 +David: I think this proposal was expertly written but may have been written with others and seemed pretty legal-ese. this seemed like a trojan horse.
 +
 +Rowan: I think ending the contract would probably be what's best for everyone. I don't think keeping someone here is a recipe for disaster. accommodations is interesting since the ... the reinstating should...anyone who leaves should have to use the same system like they have for everyone else.
 +
 +Corey: It sounds like this is something the Board is going to be talking about. and this is something that the Board is something that we're not really privy to. I want people to try and focus on what happened and if that constitutes a health and safety issue. what we did, and whether or not Fay is asking is appropriate remedy for the things that she's alleging. keep that in mind and that's what the board is going to look at most. if we're just seeing someone go "my room is making me sick and I need this agreement to make me leave" we do has a history of honoring those graceful exists funded by vacancy Reserve. you need to highlight what's different. please say so in writing or at the board meeting
 +
 +Owen: creating concessions for fay's request to leave. I agree with Rowan said, if someone wants to leave, let's work it out. and/but its at the level of a normal break in the lease for all the levels of the lease agreement, labor agreement, and whatever else gets reconciled. to be dealt with at the house level. at the CHEA level, I anticipate this will come up and I'll be there at the meeting to voice--since i'm carrying those projects forward.
  • meetings/2025-10-05.1759717147.txt.gz
  • Last modified: 2025/10/06 02:19
  • by jessimunn